I was putting together some pages covering Data Governance – I’ve spent a lot of my recent contracts doing various aspects of Data Governance/Data management – and I felt I wanted to share a dilemma? Maybe that’s overstating it; maybe, heated discussion is better?
The definition of a Data Owner that I put forward was:
A Data Owner is a nominated individual who has responsibility for a particular data asset
In most conversations about Data Ownership, we see that it’s an executive-level role. It has to be a decision-maker, someone who sees the value in the data they are responsible for.
Almost by default we talk about executive-level, or maybe first tier down from board level.
During a recent piece of work, the project team had a discussion about this. Previous consultants had advocated for, and had publsihed a draft ownership model showing executive-level Data Owners. The group CFO, COO, etc were all noted as Data Owners.
Right level or not? (BTW here’s the page I drafted about Data Ownership)
We went through the predicatble points:
- The role needs seniority
- The role needs to focus minds
- The role needs to have a clear view of the downstream Data Landscape
- The role needs to abstract the data from the system(s)
These sorts of points – and you will be able to articulate your own versions of why ownership needs to be at a senior level – tripped off the tongue. Just when we thought that this had already been sorted, we stopped:
“But is a CFO (or any other C-level officer) too far removed from day-to-day operations to take on the responsibilities we want for a Data Owner?”
Here was our ‘Goldilocks dilemma’ – senior enough to have sufficient gravitas, but not so senior that they were detached from playing an active role.
Our solution? We enhanced our roster. We started with:
Data Owner, Data Steward and Data Custodian
We finished with:
Data Sponsor, Data Owner, Data Steward and Data Custodian
Our Data Sponsor role had two principal themes:
- Ensuring that Data Governance was supported and supported the data that needed it
- Articulating the strategic goals for our data
We tweaked our Data Owner role to have the following key themes:
- Decision making
- Identifiying data opportunities
What do you think? Good solution? Bad solution? Does the ‘sponsor’ role really exist?


